Leads and sales
Capture requests, validate data, qualify the need and give the responsible person full context.
Rollder builds custom AI agents and workflow automation for lead handling, support, documents and data movement — connected to your CRM, APIs and existing systems.
One controlled workflow
AI agent for inbound requestsWe start with data, decisions and ownership. AI is added only where it provides a useful capability.
Describe your workflow →Capture requests, validate data, qualify the need and give the responsible person full context.
Find answers in approved sources and transfer complex or sensitive questions to a person.
Find facts, structure material, prepare drafts and preserve sources for review.
Synchronize CRM, APIs, spreadsheets and portals without manual copying or invisible failures.
AI agents are the primary focus. Automation, integrations and web systems create the reliable operational layer around them.
We build AI agents that use approved knowledge, execute permitted actions, hand uncertain cases to people and keep an inspectable decision trail.
Explore the solution ↗We remove manual handoffs between forms, CRM, email, Telegram, spreadsheets and internal services while keeping exceptions under control.
Explore the solution ↗We build internal portals, customer workspaces and web products as an operational part of automation, not as an isolated decorative website.
Explore the solution ↗Focused solutions
Commercial pages for common operational bottlenecks, with explicit boundaries, deliverables and human approval.
Explore all solutions →We connect lead intake, scoping, delivery and reporting so an agency can grow without adding another layer of manual coordination.
Explore →Turn fragmented inbound requests into structured, reviewable opportunities with source attribution, duplicate checks, fit reasoning and a responsible owner.
Explore →We connect lead sources, qualification, ownership and follow-up so CRM status reflects real work instead of becoming another manual reporting task.
Explore →Names and data are withheld. We show the problem, boundaries, architecture and delivered capability.
All case studies →Customers needed clear explanations of the catalogue, usage guidance and differences between products. The team wanted to automate repetitive consultations without turning the system into a source of diagnoses or personalized medical advice.
Open case study ↗The team needed a controlled way to collect market signals, compare prices with scenario estimates and apply consistent evaluation rules across a large number of events.
Open case study ↗Several departments supported client projects, while information about releases, environments, access and delivery status was distributed across different tools and people.
Open case study ↗The range is refined around the problem, data and integrations. Each phase has its own outcome and does not force a larger engagement.
Define the problem, data, exceptions, risks and the shortest useful validation.
Implement one priority scenario using controlled data.
Connect production systems, monitoring, documentation and handover.
We design systems so the team understands the boundaries, sees failures and can keep operating without depending on one vendor.
Sensitive and uncertain decisions have an explicit review or approval path.
Sources, rules, status and escalation reasons stay visible instead of hiding behind magic.
Logs, retries, alerts and a manual fallback are designed into the workflow.
Access, documentation, CI/CD and ongoing ownership are made explicit.
Practical guidance on cost, AI boundaries and process audits, based on direct engineering decisions.
All insights →Prioritize agency workflows by frequency, delay, error cost and ownership instead of automating the most visible task first.
Read →A reliable qualification system combines deterministic exclusions, explainable AI analysis, CRM context and manual approval.
Read →Test grounded answers, policy boundaries, escalation and operational failure before allowing AI into a customer support workflow.
Read →Not always. If a deterministic automation or integration is more reliable, we recommend the simpler approach.
Start with one process diagnosis or one working scenario. This validates data, boundaries and usefulness before a wider implementation.
Yes, when the system offers an API, webhook or another controlled data exchange method. Integration risks are identified before development.
Yes. Before receiving confidential details, we agree on access and data-handling rules.
Describe the workflow in a few sentences. We will identify the data and integrations that need validation before an estimate.